Skip to content

Case study · Professional services

A regional service firm that fixed its own name search

Went from owning 2 to owning 7 of the first 10 results for its name.

Who: A regional professional firm of about forty people with two offices, winning most of its work by referral and by name search.

Owned results in the first ten
7from 2
Enquiries from name searches a month
31from 18
Negative or misleading results on page one
1from 3
Weeks in a quarter a rival's ad showed on the firm's name
3 of 13from 11 of 13
Pages with a correct title and markup
100%from 20%
Owned profiles with matching details
6from 1

What changed

Most of the firm's new work started with someone typing its name into a search box. What they saw first was a directory, a rival's ad and an out-of-date listing, with the firm's own site in third place.

We fixed the page titles and the structured data that tell search engines who the firm is, built out five profiles the firm controls, and set alerts so any change to the name results is seen the day it happens.

Three months later the firm owned seven of the first ten results, the rival's ad appeared far less often, and enquiries from name searches were up by more than two thirds.

Results the firm owns in the first ten, of 10
  • Start2
  • Month 13
  • Month 25
  • Week 106
  • Month 37

The situation

A professional firm's name search was led by directories and a rival's ad, and its own site sat third.

What they wanted

  • Own the first page when someone searches the firm's name
  • Stop a rival's ad taking the top of that page
  • Make sure assistants describe the firm correctly

What we found

  • The firm had no consistent profiles
  • A rival bid on the firm's name
  • The site's title tags did not include the firm's name

What we did

  • Fixed titles and structured data
  • Built out five owned profiles
  • Set alerts for changes in the name results

How the engagement ran

  1. Weeks 1 to 2

    1. Map the name results

    We recorded the first three pages of results for the firm's name, for each partner's role and for the main services, and noted which results the firm owned.

  2. Weeks 3 to 5

    2. Fix the site

    Titles, organisation markup and the contact and about pages were corrected so the firm's own name and details were unmistakable.

  3. Weeks 6 to 9

    3. Build owned profiles

    Five profiles were created or completed with identical details and links back to the site, each chosen because it tends to rank for a name.

  4. Weeks 10 to 13

    4. Watch and respond

    Weekly alerts flagged new or changed results. Two misleading listings were corrected through the sites that hosted them.

What surprised us

  • The rival's name-bidding fell away on its own once the firm's own result became more relevant
  • One of the five profiles needed a postal verification that took three weeks

What they keep

  • Five completed profiles with matching details
  • Corrected titles and organisation markup across the site
  • Weekly alerts on changes to the name results

How we measured it

The first ten results for the firm's name, recorded every week from a neutral location with personalisation off. A result counts as owned when the firm controls the page. Enquiries are those that the firm's own form and phone log attributed to a name search.

Our name now brings people to us instead of to a directory.
Managing partner, regional firm

What is next: A review programme and local press mentions.

Ready to be found by Google and named by AI assistants?

Book a 30-minute call. We prepare a free audit of your site first, so you leave with a written read whether or not you hire us.